this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)

Casual Conversation

1534 readers
62 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've been reading a lot about personal finance. The Millionaire Next Door really opened my eyes.

I also learned about leading and lagging indicators and thought that was cool!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Small advice: take that book with a grain of salt. The author took advantage of a specific market, what he did is not achievable everywhere for everyone

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You mean it only applies to the US, or something different?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The big issue is the typical issue of survivorship bias. For obvious reasons they can only study the PAWs who are, you know, successful PAWs. So one of their claims is PAWs are willing to take economic risks if the return is high.

But what about the people who took economic risks and had it collapse under them? They'd be UAWs by their nomenclature ... yet they did a PAW thing.

In reality you learn more about what led people to failure than enumerating the things that supposedly led to people's success.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

This, thank you!