this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
579 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1928 readers
7 users here now
Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news, it probably belongs here.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
YouTube has a TON of terrible policies. I mean, the entire reason YouTube videos have sponsored sections in their videos is because YouTube screwed over creators during "adpocolypse".
The issue is that nothing can replace YouTube. Hosting that much data is unbelievably costly. No other company is willing to put up with that, especially when other companies aren't ad companies, so they don't profit as much on data.
Google is in it for the long haul. Once a really good efficient video compression or codec comes out, Google will be laughing. Pied piper is their dream lol.
I read that wiki page, and most of it is that big advertisers pulled advertising, not Youtube doing anything proactively. The idea that advertisers are going to want to be next to anything that can blow up in the media is pretty crazy - they want non-offensive content to the widest possible audience, hence blandness. IDK, I don't have any complaints about most of the channels affected based on the description on that wiki page. I think pre 2017 Advertisers just didn't know they were playing next to that sort of content.
I mean, there is peertube, and I guess if you want something too edgy for Youtube there's that, bitchute, the porn sites and onlyfans right? Again, those sites are either federated or don't depend on the same ad buyers, though IDK how much anyone outside of maybe bitchute wants various racists and bigots on their site. I'm not even sure if you could straight up pay someone like vimeo or AWS to host some video content lol.