this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
840 points (92.6% liked)
memes
10450 readers
2115 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We need regulations. It is dangerous to operate a vehicle if oncoming traffic makes it that difficult to see anything in your own lane.
The problem isn't LEDs though. The technology isn't what's making it bright.
The regulation needs to be specific about what they want the end result to be, not about the specific technology used.
Like: there should be a mode of operation where oncoming traffic at x distance, seated at y height, on level roads should not experience more than z brightness.
Or maybe actually enforce our existing laws on this, and make actual punishments for when people modify their cars and don't align their headlights.
Going after random people is harder and worse than going after the manufacturers of products.
Unless you want police shooting black people because their lights were "misaligned"
I think it is LED technology. LEDs have a very small bandwidth. Even white leds are just three very small small bandwidth emissions.
The very tight intensity in such a small bandwidth is hard on the eyes. Even when compared with the same power of older lighting technology, which has a comparatively massive bandwidth.
LEDs could be designed to compensate for this better. They could add more different colours of LEDs to the matrix that makes up white LEDs.
In the Europe we have the regulations, it still sucks. Especially OEM "active-matrix" LEDs.
How? We only read the good things about active matrix headlights, not how they behave in the real world
This is why regulations should be about the behavior they want to see and not the technology used.
The goal is not to blind drivers; companies should be able to use whatever tech they want, but they should get fined every time their tech doesn't work as expected in the real world.
Maybe you need to get your eyes checked. I rarely get blinded on the road in Germany, and when I do it's almost always someone who just forgot to turn off his high-beams. Active matrix headlights are very common here nowadays and never blind me
If we won't regulate guns despite school shootings, what hope is there to regulate cars? (Unless someone rich can get a cut?) Apparently someone else's freedumb to do dangerous things is my own freedom to stfu:-(.
All Praise and Honor be to our glorious Electoral College, may it forever prevent us from making dumb decisions such as "preventing needless deaths".
Oh, yeah, of course it is not going to happen in the US. Force a pickup truck to aim their lights at the road instead of other drivers' eyes? Political suicide. But I'd still like it to be regulated.
It is. You want it enforced too?
Even here where there are mandatory annual inspections meant to catch these things, no one ever checks headlights beyond whether they turn on and off
German TÜV inspections absolutely check that the headlights aren't foggy and are aligned correctly
Me too:-|
Guns are part of the US constitution, headlights aren't.
Well you just made it sound even more fucking stupid
Ode to Joy intensifies
It's interesting how versatile classical music can be - e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/19cyf40/protesters_singing_ode_to_joy_in_bonn_at_a/.