Legal News

248 readers

5 users here now

International and local legal news.

Basic rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flag

Some cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.

3. Instance rules apply

All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 7 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

X faces additional $1.9M fine to end ban in Brazil (techcrunch.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

X (formerly Twitter) could soon resume service in Brazil — if it’s willing to pay an additional fine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CouldntCareBear 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was banned because twitter failed to appoint a legal representative, a condition of doing business in Brazil. Failing to appoint a legal representative is kind of like sticking your fingers in your ears 'nya nya nya nya' and hoping your problems go away. They didn't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not to defend musk, but wasn't this because they threatened to arrest the legal representative so they got recalled back to the states?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Where do you get your news? X?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what happened from what I heard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it didn’t

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://apnews.com/article/x-brazil-de-moraes-musk-censorship-social-media-a5237159da8dcba5786765b59e24ec6f

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Social media platform X said Saturday it will close its operations in Brazil, claiming Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes threatened to arrest its legal representative in Brazil if they did not comply with orders.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Ok then, if they claim it must be true, right? /s