this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
12 points (54.9% liked)

Socialism

5201 readers
4 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, feel free to explain how the attack on Vietnam constitutes an occupation. Are you suggesting China's military action was carried out with the intent of annexing a part of Vietnam?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Come on, you're more well-read than this. You know that military occupation and annexation are not the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You still haven't answered what you think the intent of the military action was. Do you claim any military confrontation is occupation?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd more say that the military occupation was done for the sake of confrontation (this is similar to the official Chinese line). It was a really senseless invasion, as far as I can tell (and I disagree with the Vietnamese line that the war was expansionist).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I think we can agree on that