this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
12 points (54.9% liked)

Socialism

5201 readers
2 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (51 children)
[–] loaExMachina 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Immediately thought of Vietnam and Cambodia. OP really doesn't know much history... [Edit: I just checked because I wasn't sure, but China didn't invade Cambodia as far as I can tell. I knew they invaded Vietnam in support of Cambodia, but I didn't know whether some of the Sino-Vietnamese battles also took place in Cambodia, and apparently, no.)]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

And OP's comparison pic is nonsense for more reasons than that. The time ranges are wildly different, it's counting starting from 1776 for the US, but it starts counting from 1949 for the PRC

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

China is occupying Vietnam and Cambodia?

[–] loaExMachina 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Image says "Has invaded since PRC was founded", not "is occupying right now", don't try to change the terms of the debate when contradicted. You still could've made a point that China invaded much fewer countries than the US, but at least try to have an accurate map or the accurate words.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Portraying minor skirmishes as invasions is the height of dishonesty. Ironic that you would do that while accusing me of being inaccurate.

[–] loaExMachina 4 points 2 months ago

I don't find it dishonest or inaccurate to say that crossing a border with troops and tanks and occupying cities constitutes an invasion, but I guess it's a matter of semantics. As is calling a conflict with dozens of thousands of casualties a "minor skirmish".

load more comments (48 replies)