this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
329 points (97.1% liked)
Futurology
1808 readers
192 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wouldn't NO2 work too at similar cost? Or Helium?
NO works better, because it doesn't cause a feeling of asphyxiation.
helium is expensive af, so it's not an option. (it's also basically non-renewable and we're probably running out of helium in the medium-to-far future...so not a good idea)
Yes... I know. I thought from the perspective of someone who is willing to kill his pet with makeshift solutions, the helium scarcesty won't be No 1 priority.
I thought maybe NO2 (Laughing Gas) would be more humane.