this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
46 points (76.1% liked)

Privacy

32165 readers
123 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Convincing people to use apps such as Signal is hard work and most can't be convinced. But with those you manage to convince, do you feel happy to talk to them on Signal?

The problem is these people use Signal on Android/IOS which can't be trusted and IOS has recently been in the news for having a backdoor. And it has also been revealed that american feds are able to read everyone's push notifications and they do this as mass surveillance.

So not only do you have to convince people to use Signal which is an incredibly difficult challenge. You also have to convince them to go into settings to disable message and sender being included in the push notifications. And then there's the big question is the Android and IOS operating systems are doing mass surveillance anyway. And many people find it taking a lot of effort to type on the phone so they install Signal on the computer which is a mac or Windows OS.

So I don't think I feel comfortable sending messages in Signal but it's better than Whatsapp.

These were some thoughts to get the discussion started and set the context.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

“Feel,” “happy,” “comfortable”… Privacy doesn’t care about your feelings.

And it has also been revealed that american feds are able to read everyone’s push notifications and they do this as mass surveillance.

Speaking of the feds, it was they who funded the creation of Signal, which is one of the reasons it ought not be trusted.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They funded encryption too. Why don't you stop using that?

[–] SomeAmateur 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Wait until they find out who started the internet. Or who runs GPS satellites

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

History shows that you shouldn’t automatically trust encryption technologies from the US government.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Just throw your whole computer out the window.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is plenty of space between absolute trust and its contrapositive.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Why don't you fork Signal? Then, you'll know the glowies aren't funding you.

Which lines its libre software source code are malicious? Know what libre software is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, be a dumbass. Why don’t you fork yourself?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Will people read these comments and leave WhatsApp or will they stop caring about privacy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Totally pointless since the chokepoint is Signal's US-domiciled back-end server, and Signal doesn't allow you to self-host it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That says nothing about what they actually run on their server, or who they allow to look at their database. Most importantly, you can't self-host signal anyway, so posting the source code for something you can't verify that they even run, is pointless. They went a whole year one time without updating that repo, until the open source community made an uproar about it, and signal was forced to start updating it again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

can't self-host signal

False, read its software license, linked above.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't self-host it. People asked for this feature, and were harshly turned down by the signal devs. If you don't believe me, then try it yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's an end-to-end encrypted libre app.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reason: Disinformation

I don’t think you’re aware of who wrote Lemmy any more than you were aware of who admins lemmy.ml.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Worse, both of you should know better! See its software license cited above.

Spreading funding FUD tells us nothing about whether its license or source code is malicous, just makes people apathetic to privacy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Reason: Trolling

Good luck with that 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, the whole argument of the article is basically: funded in part by US government = bad, and making a lot of assumptions, nothing more.

The fund is designated to: “support open technologies and communities that increase free expression, circumvent censorship, and obstruct repressive surveillance as a way to promote human rights and open societies."

One should question the commitment of a fund that dedicates itself to "obstructing surveillance", while being created by a government who runs the most expansive surveillance system in world history. And how the US might define the terms "human rights", and "open society" differently from those who know the US's history in those areas.

How laughable, that is not an argument, it’s nothing more than a guessing game, ignoring that there are different parts of government and different objectives can be true.

Signal's use luckily never caught on by the general public of China, whose government prefers autonomy, rather than letting US tech control its communication platforms, as most of the rest of the world naively allows. (For example, India's most popular social media apps, are Facebook and Youtube, meaning that US surveillance giants own and control the everyday communications of a country much larger than their own). Signal instead became used by US and western activists, and due to the contradictions of surveillance capitalism, also now its general populace.

You have to be kidding right? Championing china, which created a fucking surveillance state and is heavily monitoring the citizens, as an example?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Source for China doing what the US does?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

“Feel,” “happy,” “comfortable”… Privacy doesn’t care about your feelings.

The motivation to do the work, spend time learning the risks and available mitigations, disrupt existing social relationships in order to adopt better tools, inconvenience friends and family, partially isolate one's self by avoiding the popular systems... all of these things are part of improving privacy in the real world, and at least for many people, fueled by a person's feelings. Don't discount the human factors just because you can't quantify them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, i did use words that express feelings in this topic I created and it was intentional because when people have to deal with something that involves uncertainty or something so advanced they don't understand it entirely then they can become uncomfortable and scared even though maybe there isn't something to be scared about or maybe the fear is justified.

My post was intended to be a discussion starter so we can dig into this, get to the truth and help everyone including myself to understand everything better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Well, that explains how the NSA keep getting in every so often.