this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
594 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

IDGAF about Palworld as a game, personally. I've never played it and I don't plan to. But that doesn't make Nintendo's behavior not bullshit, and I still hope the Palworld developers win this battle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Thats perhaps the dumbest shit I've ever heard and fuels my point if yall only acting like this cus "big gaming industry bad"

Palword did what thousands of scammers, Cryptoland, and some con artists Vrchat model makers do. Take a model or asset that ISNT THEIRS alter it, then sell it.

if they win. Companies like ChatGBT and AI's like it will have free rain to steal whatever shit they want, you think the government will give a shit if its from a indie game? Hell no. Everyone is gonna suffer from this dude.

Im not boutta live in a world where people, anyone ever, can take my stuff, alter it, then profit from it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, you did not read any of the articles about this or understand the suit.

Nintendo is putting this forth as a patent issue, not a copyright issue. I presume this is because even they are smart enough to realize that they would probably lose a copyright challenge. However, the patents they are attempting to claim are clearly bullshit. They're just doing this as a bludgeon to bully a company they don't like, most likely in the hopes that the sheer cost of litigation will break them.

If they were going to propose that some of the monster models from Palworld originated as Pokemon model rips, they could arguably have a leg to stand on. But that's not what they're saying. The outcome of this case is not going to have any impact on copyright issues. Rather, the potential result is much more dangerous -- it would confirm that a big company can just come in late and retroactively lay claim to large swathes of mechanical concepts that have already widely in use in a particular industry for decades.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wait.

so this whole situation isnt about Model rips???

I will respectfully shit the fuck up then and delete my comments. Im compulsive, and judging by what everyone else was saying read all if this as

A. Fuck nintendo cus they bad

B. The patent is that they ripped their models.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It is not about model rips. Check your inbox to my other reply to another of your comments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I did, I deleted/edited my comments (◍•ᴗ•◍)👍🏾