this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
296 points (92.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5393 readers
1891 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
296
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I want to believe this is real, but I'm having trouble deciphering how one would "solve" this equation given no variable is referenced outside of the question and k is already isolated and terms simplified.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

i’m guessing they want you to solve for x by rearranging and then taking arcsin

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Considering the handwriting, it's probably all written by the same person. But even if it wasn't, it is very badly written if you had to solve it by making assumptions, imo.