Technology

59708 readers

1869 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

207

No One Is Buying AMD Zen 5 CPUs, So What's Going On? (www.techspot.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gaming is one thing, a lot is GPU bound anyways, probably the same with "physical modeling"

But you cannot tell me your "data processing" would not be greatly sped up by using a newer proc (assuming it's not also GPU bound). Does it work, sure, but if it takes you 2 hours for it to process now but <30 minutes on something newer that's just a waste of time, resources and money. It's incredibly inefficient.

On the flip side, if all your work is GPU bound no wonder a 3rd gen proc from 2012 is keeping up lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

My modelling is CPU bound as it's a model made in Fortran by physicists (me included). The fact is that I wouldn't get a 4x boost, and a model running overnight still would. When I actually need performance I use a 1000 cores compute cluster for multiple days, so that would never run on any consumer CPU anyways.

For the data processing, the real bottle neck is disk access and my scripting speed, so the CPU doesn't really need to be amazing.