this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
586 points (83.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5873 readers
2900 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That is in absolutely no way implied by that statement; the existance of a truth does not imply the existance of it's inverse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yes but focusing on one side of the discussion ignoring its counterpart is a clear sign of bias, so despite being technically correct it's unhelpful

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

What?? Keeping a discussion to one aspect of a topic is absolutely not an example of bias, it's an example of contextual scope. It's the only reason we can have a discussion about anything without having to include the full context it's situated within (which would be the entire universe).