this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
842 points (97.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
505 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    842
    Snap out of it (lemmy.zip)
    submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
     

    How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution's repositories?

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    There is no software that is not in AUR. I use arch, BTW.

    [–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    But yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

    Indeed, but don't underestimate my laziness.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I guess we should have added the word “notable”

    I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;)

    I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

    Ouch. xD

    It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?

    The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that's it you have your appimage.

    appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc

    And that on itself isn't complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I've recently forked and began expanding.

    I don't know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result.

    EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn't ready yet.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

    There's so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

    Rpg paper maker

    Though the Linux version is now in a “do not use” state. The developer decided to just make it into a web app because it was only working on Ubuntu

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    Gatekeeping the word "software" here?
    Here's something not in the AUR. Tested on arch

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35

    Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it's in the AUR. No exceptions.

    Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I don't intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It's not worth it.
    Maybe I'll make an AppImage at most.

    I don't know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there.

    [–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

    Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

    Someone will put the AppImage in AUR

    [–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    This is such a weird gatekeeper take

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

    Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

    i use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it's AUR support) :>