this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
577 points (79.7% liked)

Memes

45629 readers
1126 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Solution to the problem: ban right-wingers, impose socialism and if rich people get too noisy send secret services to deal with them Pinochet-style. Bam, capitalism defeated in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nah, it is. Seize all their assets and if they complain, again, some Pinochet-style methods that will bend them to our knees.

Sorry, patience is over and right-wingers and their financiers must be dealt with the appropriate way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, tired of world going to shit and if we need someone that makes Stalin look like a kitten to fix it, so be it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That will not fix it. You're advocating for adventurism, not leftism.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

adventurism

Adventurist leftism, maybe?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Whatever that poster planned to implement their beliefs would probably devolve into adventurism but, taken at face value, I think it would be much more accurate to call their proposal blanquist.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seize who's assets exactly? The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you, you're falling right in line with those same right-wing policies.

There is no way to define a law against "right-wingers" that doesn't infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can't punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Seize who’s assets exactly?

Rich people's

The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you

Nah, just do it against rich people.

There is no way to define a law against “right-wingers” that doesn’t infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can’t punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

Fuck this fake democracy then.