Conservative

357 readers

64 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

hey yall (discuss.online)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What'd y'all think of the debate?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It would be hilarious to see you as a lawyer working with a witness that has previously lied on the stand. “Your witness is not credible, they have accepted money to lie in the past.” “That’s an ad hominem, you cannot do that.”

At least you learned what an ad hominem fallacy is, you're a little less ignorant now. If you want to treat it like a court case you would need to provide evidence that the author has made up articles in the past, you have not.

You did not provide a source for letting “babies” “die” on a table after “birth.” You provided delusional propaganda where a liar was willing to write that based on weird definitions that nobody but you regressives agree with.

The only source you've provided was one which ended up discrediting your claim that abortions are denied when the life of the mother is in jeopardy. You haven't provided others and instead rely on logical falicies to prove your point.

You additionally are confirmed to support child molesters harming children, rapists harming their victims, and want a rapist in the White House. Disgusting and repugnant.

Crazy rantings of a person who enjoys babies being left to die on a cold hard table.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I did provide evidence. You know full well the Heritage Foundation is not credible.

You guys have nothing but lies on top of delusions. No babies are dying on a table. You are just a rape fan inventing fake shit to support control over women.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

I did provide evidence. You know full well the Heritage Foundation is not credible.

That's not evidence it's an accusation. Where's the proof that the article is false? Where's the proof the author made up the quotes from the Minnesota Department of health? You know full well the article is accurate.

You guys have nothing but lies on top of delusions. No babies are dying on a table. You are just a rape fan inventing fake shit to support control over women.

If there are lies you should be able to find proof of those lies but you're too busy fantasizing about killing babies to provide proof.