this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
732 points (95.5% liked)

Atheism

4068 readers
28 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Talking about it is pretty normal as in it's not very rare or distinct thing, pretty mundane. That's why being alarmed by it seems strange.

Americans aren’t used to being criticised as “barbaric” imo.

I think most of the world does that to them already.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Pretty mundane."

For.. you.

It's very rare where I live. We don't practice genital mutilation. So it makes one raise one's eyebrows somewhat when people consider it... "pretty mundane."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not mundane for me or where I live but their post mentioned the wife was Jewish and I assumed the person was American, in both of those cases it'd be a very mundane topic when it comes to babies.

You should consider this from their context, not yours or mine.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sort of tired of repeating myself...

Yes, I understand that FOR AMERICANS, the genital mutilation of infants is very mundane.

The point I'm making is that we know that "what people are used to" doesn't define what is right or wrong. We know that. Granted, it's hard to say where exactly morals come from, but when we face something that feels grossly immoral, we have a strong feeling about it. Like say things having to do with the genitals of defenseless infants.

The shocking part in this is how it's acceptable for some — like you — that some people do accept these things. There's a whole lot of shit that say, former fascist states have done, which would be beyond horrendous, even if somewhat "mundane" to the people living in those states at those times. I'm sure you wouldn't say "you should consider it from X perspective" if I was talking about that, because you'd realise I'm not talking about the morality of the controversial thing, I'm talking about how shocking it is how easily we (humans in general) can make horrendous things feel mundane by being exposed to them for a while, despite there still being knowledge that that thing isn't okay. so essentially it's willfull ignorance of something we know to be wrong, and the fact that we can do that so easily...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about right or wrong, just what is normal or mundane. I haven't taken any moral position on that.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and what I am saying is that you should.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Seems pretty useless to do that here, now, when we all agree.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you agree that you should have an opinion on this, when you just explicitly avoided that, despite that having been my point all along?

Ei tarvinnu kyllä nickiä kattoa että tunnisti suomalaisen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have always had an opinion about it, I just don't see a reason to bring it up when it is not the point of what I'm saying. That could be a little obnoxious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes, it would just be totally obnoxious to voice an opinion against child genital mutilation, on a FORUM.

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.”

― Desmond Tutu (Foreword)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's on a place where everyone already agrees and it's not even the point of what I was saying then yes, it can be pretty obnoxious.

If you are neutral

I'm not neutral though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m not neutral though.

I haven’t taken any moral position on that.

Okay. Ever heard of the term "avoidance"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You've misunderstood. I have a moral position, I haven't made a moral stance in this thread. Do you get the difference?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For about a dozen comments, I've been banging on about how my point is that my opinion is that there is absolutely no reason not to oppose child genital mutilation — during which you first actively avoided even taking a stance, and now say you always had a stance, but just refrained from telling it out of politeness.

I've seen this a thousand times. Like I said, I knew your nationality before I happened to gaze at the nick. That attitude is exactly what I've been protesting the whole time. Protesting, and reiterating that I'm protesting it. Which you've not gotten. Despite me pointing this out several times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're here protesting someone (who already agrees with you) because I didn't care to soapbox about my view since the discussion didn't call for it and we all already agree. This is slacktivism at its finest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You very explicitly stated "I haven’t taken any moral position on that", but after I point out how weird it would be to not have a position on that, you suddenly always had one, just conveniently adding "in this thread" to the end.

You chose to say that you're actively deciding not to voice an opinion, ie you're proclaiming a neutral position in the context of this conversation. That is a position.

It's not soapboxing to not be pathologically avoidant of ever having an opinion publicly.

The sad part is you honestly don't even what I'm talking about. I'm yet to figure out what it is about the Finnish language / culture / mentality which breeds this sort of thing. It's infuriatingly common in Finland.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’ve misunderstood. I have a moral position, I haven’t made a moral stance in this thread.

I already explained it to you in an earlier reply. At this point I'm really not sure what you're hoping to achieve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You've excused something, yes.

I'm hoping to get through to you, and failing miserably, I'm honestly having a hard time coming up with a more explicit explanation than the dozen I've given. I bet you haven't even looked up avoidance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m hoping to get through to you, and failing miserably

You sure are. Because I have no idea what you were trying to achieve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We agree on this, definitely. If you reread the thread a few times after informing yourself of how avoidance as a coping strategy works, you'll have a chance, I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Coping about... what, exactly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This was a fun discussion, started out of nothing and never went anywhere