this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
603 points (88.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5388 readers
2676 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Horrible at chemistry, but I'm 98% sure it is chloride - the chlorine is present as an anion, and as such is called chloride. Even if you refer to it as an individual component, you still observe Cl-, not Cl (or rather Cl2).

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, the element is chlorine. Chloride denotes a compound or molecule containing a chlorine ion, or a compound with a non-charged chlorine atom bonded.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This whole thread is very pedantic but in chemistry when someone refers to chlorine, they are usually referring to Cl2. I think in IUPAC naming chloride is reserved for for ions. Like dichloromethane (IUPAC) and methylene chloride (also common name).

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a phd in chemistry. You are correct. The whole thread is pedantic garbage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks for clearing that up. I was worried

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Sometimes I read highly pivoted comments with info that is plain wrong and think I'm taking crazy pills.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Now I am confused. Mind bearing with me for a sec?

I was referring to the chlorine present in NaCl, that should in fact be chloride due to it's anionic nature, should it not? I mean sure it's pedantic, but I'd still like to know where I went wrong with that thought :D .