this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
143 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34125 readers
72 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

TLDR; the front side is 23% efficient, and the rear side 20% efficient.

They don't actually give an overall efficiency but it implies a total of 43%. They compare this to typical panels also at 23% efficient, so it's really remarkable if true. Other emerging solar tech is up to about 32% but if that could also benefit from multiple layers then total efficiency could become insane.

Seems a little too good to be true, really, but great if so.

Edit: Yeah, I don't think these efficiencies can be added like that. I guess the overall efficiency will depend on how reflective the ground under the panels is, and they will extract 20% of that. Maybe that's why they don't give an overall rating.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don’t think you can just add up efficiency percentages like that…

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Sure you can. That's why a UV lamp shining at the six 20% solar panels that power it can run your FTL drive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think you're right there. My bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just need another sun on the opposite side

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They say the second layer retains 93% of the performance of the first using reflected light, making it 20% efficient, so, yes they are added in that case.

[–] JohnDClay 3 points 1 year ago

There isn't nearly as much light coming from the back, so you won't get that much efficiency improvement