politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Economic case? ..... in a few decades it will be a humanitarian case and in a century it will probably be an existential case.
But still
It's way better than the alternative orange monster waiting in the wings.
You're correct... but it also is an economic case. If we want to continue having a robust economy we need the world to not collapse into chaos.
I agree that there are much more reasonable existential reasons to lean on but like... if "Climate change will cause NVidia to drop 900%" gets finance bros on board with a solution then fucking well done.
We need action and at this point I really don't care if everyone properly understands the why - just as long as those fucks don't stand in the way of the what (specifically, a solution).
There's also money to be made from climate change action, particularly for those countries that get this done earlier. People who care about the bigger picture don't need to be convinced by that, but it can help convince the rest.
I always thought that about solar panel production here in the US: oops, let’s send that overseas, and windmills: oops, someone else can do that, trains: oops, no need for that here. I hope they follow through with the economic reasons to stop climate change but business seems mostly about opportunities sent elsewhere.
This is probably the right take, although I’m sure some segment of the population will hear “So you’re saying keep going the way we’re going but short NVidia?”
One of the primary arguments against doing anything is that it might hurt the economy. If you can counter that claim, by pointing out that it will actually help the economy, then you've removed an argument against doing anything.
You mean to tell me that climate change isn't already a humanitarian case?
not yet ... not enough first world people have been affected yet