this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16371 readers
896 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 128 points 4 weeks ago (41 children)

Call me old fashioned but I miss the old days when shit like this would take decades to discover and even then it would be shrouded in doubt and mystery.

Kids today just hop on youtube and know all the secrets in a short 40 minute video full of ads sponsorships and fillers.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

If you read the article, this isn't a rarest ending like the headline says. There is an ending playing as Lae'zel most players don't take because it's a bad ending that obviously ends the story. The ending being talked about is a hacked ending that was maybe an idea at one point to get to the above ending via an alternative path, but wasn't ultimately implemented. I wouldn't even call this an ending frankly. It's more "there's some game files that can lead to each other if X or Y is marked, but actually can't because Z being marked cuts that path off". More of a glitch than anything.

[–] conciselyverbose 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

lol I definitely (saved, then) took the Gale ending. No way I wasn't choosing it. Can you not do that with Lae'zel?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

So from the article the Lae'zel ending only happenings if you

Super spoiler don't think there's a spoiler text accepted across all instances yet

Accept becoming a mind flayer and some events thereafter and then follow through with Vlaak'ith telling you to kill yourself. This "rare no one's taken" glitch ending seems to be if you listen to Vlaak'ith, but don't turn mind flayer you can still take the kill yourself ending if you check the mind flayer box ...despite not being mind flayer. Which could only happen through a glitch. So it's just a you could take this path if you'd checked X box but you didn't so can't "ending". I'm not sure what this article is trying to say honestly as it's literally just "if you make X choice you could get Y ending, but if you glitch the game to believe you made X choice you could get Y ending" article.

load more comments (38 replies)