this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
1409 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

57432 readers
4279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I feel like communities are the bigger problem here. And not one that's easily solved.

If users from multiple instances come together in communities, those communities are still centralized on a single server. So if something happens to that server, or if your instance defederates with it, the whole community goes with it.

The alternative would be to have tons of duplicate communities spread over many instances, but that's a bad user experience.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it can continue even without the source server? Like, once I press the Reply button on this comment, it gets saved to my instance (lemmings.world) then it lets all the other instances know, including lemmy.world (where the community is hosted) and slrpnk.net where you are registered.

Now let's say lemmy.world stops existing, my instance still would let all the other instances it federates with know, meaning you could read my reply on a community that basically no longer exists. Though I'm pretty sure there are downsides to that (like, what if all the mods were from lemmy.world? There's no admin who can add a new mod).

At least that's what I think it works like.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

meaning you could read my reply on a community that basically no longer exists

oh really? does it actually work this way? if lemmy.world dies, can all its communities continue to live on as long as there are lemmy instances out there federated and subscribed?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. You would only ever be interacting with a snapshot-at-the-time-of-death of the community on your local instance only. It is the home instance of the community that federates all events, not the instance of the originating post/comment/vote/whathaveyou.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah, ok. So if lemmy.world dies, but [email protected] was federated to 2 different other instances, those instances wouldn't be able to "talk to each other"? They'd just have snapshots that they could locally interact with, but never see anything else? So is the fate of the Lemmyverse a graveyard of communities from dead instances?

[–] SimplePhysics 3 points 1 year ago

Yep, without the source instance, you can’t communicate with other instances.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder about this as well -- because communities are tied to a specific home instance, that instance going down affects that community, potentially killing it. Something more akin to hashtags/tags/labels wouldn't be tied to an instance so they would be more robust, though you'd lose the moderation of a community and just have a firehose of posts/comments...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, you're right. We really need to bring back something like USENET, where newsgroups (their "communities") weren't tied to a specific server. We could almost just resurrect NNTP, although the handling of images (and binary data more generally) probably needs some tweaking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

no need to resurrect it, usenet still exists and has a bit of discussion traffic (and a lot of binary traffic) but we just need to get users to swap over. course there needs to be some decent mobile apps made as well.

[–] Corkyskog 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesum Crow... Tags aren't a new concept. Just group communities with a tag... is that incredibly complicated to implement or something?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There needs to be a way for a person or group to essentially own a tag to enable moderation. It might be one of those rare problems for which a block chain is a good solution, because there would need to be a public ledger showing who is a moderator for a tag at any given moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no need to own a tag, nor to tack blockchain into a problem to try and sell a solution. Ever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem confused about what block chains actually are. I'm not suggesting anyone sell anything.

And if you think moderation isn't needed for healthy online communities, I invite you to visit Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Moderation like you are proposing in no way requires someone to "own a tag".

Anyone can use #CocaCola. Coca Cola Company does not get to dictate, audit or execute how people use the tag, nor should anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who is allowed to take mod actions, then, if tags replace communities?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t have to be a bad ue though. The concept of multi-communities would make it easier to see communities based on topic.

And having a search automation that find like communities, even if just the same community name on different instances would really go a long way.