Data is Beautiful

852 readers

262 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Cost of running the Olympics (journals.sagepub.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221098741#:~:text=The%20average%20return%2Don%2Dinves

Los Angeles was able to have a surplus as most of the infrastructure was already built before the Games.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hakase 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think blue and red are supposed to be "Profit" and "Loss", not revenues and costs, since I'm pretty sure all Olympics have both revenues and costs. Also, the Y-axis is already labeled deficit and surplus, so why not just use those instead of conflicting, misleading terms?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

There is another graph for detailed cost and revenue in the article (figure 2), the one is meant to be a summary to differenciate deficit and surplus