-32
Kamala Promises To Deliver Platform ‘Next Week’ — People Remind Her She Already Did That In 2019
(www.dailywire.com)
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
-32 points (11.9% liked)
Conservative
377 readers
18 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm saying you're pissed, because you clearly are.
Old-man pussygrabber and the Genital Observation Party are hated by the real Americans and you can't handle it.
Maybe you shouldn't tell people how they feel. I get the left thinks they can read minds and other supernatural powers, but you cannot.
That's pretty rich coming from the reactionary.
I'm not reading minds, I'm looking at the evidence.
So mad lol!
Sure, show me where I said anything remotely being pissed. It's so weird you think you can read minds.
I usually throw a hissy-fit like this when I'm not mad LMAO!
I never threw a hissy fit. It's so weird you think you can read minds. Some would say creepy but I will stick with weird.
LMAO!
Yeah, you're totally not pissed about the Dems (accurately) calling the Genital Observation Party "weird."
Where would anyone get that idea?!
It's so funny when reactionaries haven't received their marching orders yet.
The really funny thing is I knew it was coming since it's your go-to move now.
Reactionaries always tell on themselves.
I don’t remember saying I was pissed about anything. That’s just you hearing voices in your head and that’s weird. I didn’t even comment until you started hearing voices in your head.
You're right. I shouldn't tell people what to think. I'm so sorry that I hurt your feelings.
For all I know, you could be ecstatic (that means really happy) that real Americans hate old-man pussygrabber and the Genital Observation Party.
Will you ever forgive me?
Didn't hurt my feelings. I just it concerning when people have imaginary conversations when themselves.
As you can see above, I never said anything until you started to argue against something I never said. That's weird as shit.
Comedy. Gold.
Oh you are weird. Rarely have I met anyone in the wild who says they can read minds.
I'm definitely weird.
The difference is that it doesn't bother me LOL!
Real Americans are proud of who they are.
There is no doubt you are weird. Anyone who hears voices in their head is weird. It just shows we can all agree on something.
You lack metacognition?
That explains so much.
I lack nothing. You are just incapable of having a conversation about a topic and try to talk about people. It is a typical liberal thing to do since they can't understand issues, and they resort to their internal childish instincts.
You have yet to address the topic and have tried to comment only on people. That is a violation of R1. Try to focus on the topic and not people.
Someone's pissed that they can dish it out but not take it! 😂
Lol the dude replied to your original comment, not to talk about what you said, but to make it clear, he ain’t mad! Then calls you weird countless times, personal attack. Then threatens ‘rule number 1’ because you are off topic
Yeah, I talked about the topic in my very first comment.
Frankly, I'm just proud of him for not giving a source that completely refutes his argument like he normally does.
Guess avoiding a topic entirely will make that less likely.