this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
282 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk 214 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Newsweek: we're such shit journalists that we don't know what overhauls means and probably meant to use "overtakes".

(Just to be clear, this wasn't a copy error on the poster - the article title is literally that)

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was imagining her giving him a combination makeover and tune-up 😆

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Slap a little eyeliner on him just like his boy Vance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had to look it up, but using overhaul with the meaning of overtake is apparently valid. It sounds odd to me, and I've never actually heard it used that way, but Merriam-Webster validates it.

[–] xmunk 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Oh weird, I even asked around with some of my linguistically minded coworkers and nobody was familiar with that expression. I wonder if there's a region where it's a more common usage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Language is always evolving, never static. A dictionary and the definitions are backwards looking always. Dictionaries are always trying to keep up with the evolutions of language, but they'll always lag behind.

Just keep in mind that words change how they're used over our lifetimes, and it never stops.

E. G. Irregardless is now a valid word, when 15 and 20 years ago it was people mixing up regardless or irrespective so now I don't even get that high horse anymore 😉

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I'd believe that overhauls in this sense means that they have completely restructured/breathed new life to their campaign and thus gained favorability

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They have since overhauled the headline.

[–] xmunk 5 points 3 months ago

Ha! They did mean "Overtakes"!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That and they could have directly said she's ahead by 9 points amongst independents.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Think less like a person trying to get your point across in a clear manner, and more like a person trying to generate clicks for money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought maybe she fired Trump and Vance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago