this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
663 points (78.4% liked)

World News

38500 readers
4330 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Making nutritious food more expensive is not a good plan. This only harms the poor and vulnerable. Holding the top 100 companies responsible for climate change is a much better starting point

https://peri.umass.edu/greenhouse-100-polluters-index-current

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nobody NEEDS to eat meat 3x per day. Subsidize healthy food options instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Animal products are incredibly harmful to the climate and are inherently wasteful.

Those corporations get their money from people like you.

Yes regulation would be the best to stop them but you know that's not gonna happen any time soon, especially when everyone refuses to change their own habits, politicians aren't gonna force through regulations that get people angry because they want their steaks.

Why do you want to continue to participate in something bad until it's legally not allowed anymore?
Why not do what you can (stop consuming animal products) while also advocating for regulation and political change?

What does holding evil corporations accountable look like if not refusing to give them your money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The "top 100 companies" line misplaces blame because, as you can clearly see, they produce shit the world uses constantly (the top "emitters" are all fuel/logistics)

You can't "hold them responsible" without things like carbon taxes that are all politically non-viable in most places. The companies aren't emitting, themselves - demand for their products is the problem.

All those power plants aren't on as a hobby. They're powering homes. The emitters are the end users.