this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
171 points (96.7% liked)

And Finally...

1118 readers
15 users here now

A place for odd or quirky world news stories.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman was left "devastated" after her daughter's passport application was rejected because she was named after a Game of Thrones character.

Lucy, 39, from Swindon in Wiltshire, said the Passport Office initially refused the application for Khaleesi, six.

Officials said they were unable to issue a passport unless Warner Brothers gave permission because it owned the name's trademark. But the authority has since apologised for the error.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 110 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

owned the name's trademark

People really don't understand trademark despite it being in the name. It's a trade mark. It's a mark on something you trade. It only applies to commercial products. Unless Warner Brothers sells children there's no trademark violation.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Unless Warner Brother's sells children

With the way the world is lately, it wouldn't surprise me if they did.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Although, if any one company was going to that, it'd probably be Disney.

[–] ilovededyoupiggy 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

When they age out of the It's A Small World cast, Disney sells them to Nestlé.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm prepared to believe this, so won't be fact-checking it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I sometimes pretend to be one at home. "Hold the front page!", "this story is too good not to be true!", etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What for? By then it's too late to make baby powder out of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)