this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
392 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

303 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

transcript [text overlaid on several pictures of benches and outside windowsills. the benches have bars, or gaps to prevent someone from sleeping on them.

text reads "Ban anti-homeless arctithecture"]

sauce: https://mastodon.social/@AnarchistArt/112901196516297447

Hostile architecture is among the symptoms of the hostile modern city, where neighbours never say hi, and people die on the streets as people walk passivly by.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's like pigeon protectors... except for humans. Sad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And I feel sad about most pigeon ~~protectors~~ spikes too.

Why design such a place in nature (buildings), that contact of the smallest bit of nature requires extra maintenance or add-ons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You feel bad for pigeon spikes and are asking why things that are built require maintenance or additions due to natural causes..? That seems patently obvious to me. I have no idea what you're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The question is why not design it to need less maintenance & be accommodating to animal and plants.

Why some styles are chosen isn't just art but often also economy pushing what's profitable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mmk. I think maybe addressing the causes of the rampant and expanding unhoused population would be a good priority.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I was talking about pigeons & other nature, but I guess homeless people too.

Why not create places for them or at least modify the places they use to better suit them.

I'm don't mean this as a solution, just that its dickish to not think about environment that is being created.