Technology

59689 readers

2654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

285

Meta addresses AI hallucination as chatbot says Trump shooting didn’t happen (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 months ago by thearch to c/[email protected]

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta "programmed it to simply not answer questions," but it did anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

You can’t prove that things like events having happened are correct.

You can't so solidly that this shouldn't even be discussed.

What should be is whether you can make a machine capable of reasoning.

There's symbolic logic, so you can maybe some day make a machine that makes correct syllogisms, detects incorrect syllogisms and such.

People who don’t understand how they work assume they’re actually intelligent and can do more than this. This is dangerous and should be dispelled quickly, or they believe any garbage it spits out, like the example from this post.

Sadly there's that archetype of "the narrow-minded not cool scientist against the cool brave inventor" which means that actively dispelling that may do harm. People who don't understand will match the situation with that archetype and it will reinforce their belief.