this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)
Space
8347 readers
277 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What a weird article, ULA is just as commercial as SpaceX, and they've been launching all sorts of military payloads.
Now, I get that the US government would rather not be dependent on a billionaire who is on very friendly terms with their geopolitical opponents. But that doesn't mean SpaceX doesn't exist.
SpaceX doesn't use Russian engines, though. That's what this article is referring to, now all US rockets are free from Russian parts.
Technically this isn't true. The US military no longer has any unfulfilled launch contracts that will use Russian engines, but the ULA still has some RD-180s that they will almost certainly use for future commercial launches. Today simply marks the end of the RD-180 as a means of launching military payloads.