this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1135 points (87.4% liked)

Political Memes

5204 readers
2683 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

What can a computer know? Only what signals you feed it. Whether those signals are true or not can't really be determined. Doesn't matter if you send a million of the same thing. Labeled as "peer review". There is no determining what is the certain truth of something. It's the reason we have English prime.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yes there is. You're acting like objective truths don't exist. Water is made of 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen atoms. We know this, we can repeat it, it is predictable. This is why the scientific method exists.

I mean you're expressing a lot of strong opinions for someone who says they don't know anything. You seem to know enough to disagree with me at the very least lol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Objective truths only exist in information handling from a singular perspective. That water you're talking about can just as easily be part of a simulation. A better example of an objective truth is that 2 inputs in an AND gate turned on outputs on. You can show me something you call an AND gate and show me a million results with various inputs and outputs and I can learn to trust it even, but I can't determine with absolute certainly that it's an AND gate. I'll still play with it though. It's working knowledge, not absolute truth. You should look up English prime.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This isn't solipsism or anything close to it. It's purely rational. The point is for people to describe their experience and observations without determining what something is on some kind of ridiculous inherent level. Y'all just wanna dictate facts and feel like you're authority. That is not science.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

The irony of that last sentence lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)