this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
168 points (88.5% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4163 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington, DC – Vice President Kamala Harris says she will “not be silent” in the face of Palestinian suffering, as Israel’s war in Gaza rages on.

But Palestinian rights advocates want to know exactly what that means for United States foreign policy.

The vice president — and the Democrats’ likely nominee for the presidency — emphasised the plight of Palestinians in Gaza after meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday. Nevertheless, she pledged ongoing support for Israel.

Activists say expressing sympathy for Palestinians without pursuing a meaningful shift away from the US’s policy of unconditional military and diplomatic support will not help Harris win back voters alienated by President Joe Biden’s approach to the war.

“Without an actual commitment to stop killing the children of Gaza, I don’t care about her empathy for them,” said Eman Abdelhadi, a sociologist at the University of Chicago. She stressed that the US bears “responsibility” for the atrocities committed against Palestinians.

“To be empathetic to someone that you’re shooting in the head is not exactly laudable. We don’t need empathy from these people. We need them to stop providing the weapons and the money that is actively killing the people that they’re supposedly empathising with.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Basically same difference.

It was a preliminary ruling. That's the closest to "definitely committing genocide" you can get in a preliminary ruling.

I wonder what your deflection will be when the ICJ warrants are granted and Netanyahu can't go to most of the world without being arrested...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, all it states is there are grounds to investigate. That is how law works. Innocent until guilty. They would have convicted by now had the evidence been as cut and dry as you think it is.

Guilty? Good. Arrest them. Until then due process is paramount in a civilized society that doesn't execute people for being gay or trans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, all it states is there are grounds to investigate

Bullshit. "Grounds to investigate" doesn't come with orders.

That is how law works. Innocent until guilty

They've been proven guilty again and again for 75 years. That the US keep vetoing every resolution doesn't make the fascist apartheid regime innocent.

They would have convicted by now had the evidence been as cut and dry as you think it is.

No. As alluded to above, there's a shitload of pressure from the likes of the US to never hold Israel accountable for their countless atrocities.

Guilty? Good. Arrest them.

You can't be this fucking obtuse. You literally can't think that it's that simple. 🤦

Until then due process is paramount

Where's the due process for the 200k Gazans Israel has killed since October, most of whom were innocent civilians?

execute people for being gay or trans.

Israel kills a LOT more gay and trans Gazans than Hamas does. Also, it's not very LGBTQ+ friendly to blackmail LGBTQ Palestinians into informing on their neighbors

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I won't reciprocate your personal attacks. Perpetual revenge isn't my kink. I'll just leave your comment there as a monument to your side's ability to see reason, seek and accept true justice, and not excuse reprehensible behaviour with false tu quoques.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Perpetual revenge isn't my kink.

I guess you just back the world champions of oppression and disproportionate retribution for nonsexual reasons, then. That's slightly better, I guess 🤷

I'll just leave your comment there as a monument to your side's ability to see reason

Your version of "seeing reason" is genocide denial. Stop trying to gaslight me with your Hasbara nonsense, please.

seek and accept true justice

That's exactly what I'm doing ffs 🤦

not excuse reprehensible behaviour

Such as genocide with a side of deliberately targeting aid workers, healthcare workers and journalists trying to show the world what's happening? This you?