Technology

59105 readers

3244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

628

Traveling this summer? Maybe don’t let the airport scan your face. (www.vox.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

151 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
The Algorithmic Justice League's "Freedom Flyers" campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I’ve had DLs in multiple states and they all required fingerprints. The little digital ones. Maybe that’s not the case everywhere though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, weird. They don't require prints for a DL in TX, but we're already closing in on an authoritarian state anyways. I didn't know this was a thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It probably has to do with whether the driver's license is Real ID compliant or not. Here in Minnesota, you have the option of getting the Real ID license that can be used as a federal ID card for things like flying, or the regular old driver's license which soon will really only be good for showing you're allowed to drive a car.

I only have the regular driver's license so I don't know what all getting the Read ID involves, but having your biometric data scanned and stored seems like something they'd require.

[–] Oni_eyes 2 points 3 months ago

Texas is real id compliant. Has been for like seven years iirc

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 3 months ago

I'm in Utah and have a "real ID" or whatever (the little gold star) and never had my fingerprints taken, eyes scanned, etc. If they required that, I'd say no and just use my passport instead, which also didn't require biometrics.