Programming

17392 readers

163 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Use plain text email (useplaintext.email)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been seeing comments about mailing lists. They usually want plaint text emails like these.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree with 1.

I disagree with 2. Tuta works on multiple devices at the same time. Empirically

A. My point about having all data at rest encrypted still stands.

Depending on your threat model, having properties one, and a are sufficient. All of your historic data encrypted at rest has value for people.

I also agree with your statement about keeping all of your mail history local on an encrypted drive. That would also work. But you lose the cloud aspect of having a completely client-side encrypted service provider

Clearly tuta doesn't fit your threat/usage model. But it does work and does provide a valuable service/trade off for people who want cloud based client side encryption for data at rest.