this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
564 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60116 readers
2312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new bill to make it easier to authenticate and detect artificial intelligence-generated content and protect journalists and artists from having their work gobbled up by AI models without their permission.

The Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act) would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create standards and guidelines that help prove the origin of content and detect synthetic content, like through watermarking. It also directs the agency to create security measures to prevent tampering and requires AI tools for creative or journalistic content to let users attach information about their origin and prohibit that information from being removed. Under the bill, such content also could not be used to train AI models.

Content owners, including broadcasters, artists, and newspapers, could sue companies they believe used their materials without permission or tampered with authentication markers. State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission could also enforce the bill, which its backers say prohibits anyone from “removing, disabling, or tampering with content provenance information” outside of an exception for some security research purposes.

(A copy of the bill is in he article, here is the important part imo:

Prohibits the use of “covered content” (digital representations of copyrighted works) with content provenance to either train an AI- /algorithm-based system or create synthetic content without the express, informed consent and adherence to the terms of use of such content, including compensation)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

LOL

So I take your photo, remove your watermark, put my own watermark on it, and then I sue you for removing my watermark.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Don't be a fool. Of course, content corporations like Disney or the NYT are able to prove just when something was made.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Don't be a fool either.

Of course I am going to do this to you, not to Disney etc. because I am way better at creating proof than you are.

And of course Disney etc. are going to do this to you and me, because they are even better at creating proof than you and me are.

That's how foolish this law is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that this is a law designed to extend corporate control over information and culture even further?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This bill reads like it was written by Adobe.

This provenance labelling scheme already exists. Adobe was a major force behind it. (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Authenticity_Initiative ). This bill would make it so that further development will be tax-funded through organizations like DARPA.

Of course, they are also against fair use. They pay license fees for AI training. For them, it means more cash flow.

[–] explodicle 0 points 5 months ago

It's pretty cheap to just time stamp everything.