this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
454 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3583 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The vice president told a crowd of roughly 20,000 in Dallas that former President Donald J. Trump had said he would terminate the Constitution in a second term.

“Consider: Donald Trump has openly vowed if re-elected he’ll be a dictator on day one, that he will weaponize the Department of Justice against his political enemies, round up peaceful protesters and throw them out of our country and even, and even and I quote, ‘terminate’ the United States Constitution,” Ms. Harris said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, realistically we knew it four years ago...

Its why we kept trying to argue Biden needed a better VP. But moderates told us VPs don't matter.

I can hold my nose for Kamala, but fuck man. If there ain't a real primary next election I'm over the party.

I've voted D for president for literally 20 years now...

08 was the only time I didnt just vote against the Republican party.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If the DNC doesn't take this as a wake up then I don't know how we're going to avert catastrophe. But I can already see another primary in 2028 with no challengers because the DNC scared them all off to protect the incumbent democratic president. And I'm not sure what happens with 3 sham primaries ~~in a row.~~

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh wow, I'm really frickin tired. They weren't in a row. My mind jumped from 2016 where Hillary Clinton already had control of the party's assets to 2024 and 2028. Sorry about that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No problem.

I won't go so far as to say 2016 was rigged, but the DNC definitely tipped the scale for somebody who already was going to get the nomination regardless.

The fact of the matter is, Bernie pulls more support from independents than he does centrist democrats. He proved that the left is taking over the party, but we aren't where we need to be yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The fact of the matter is, Bernie pulls more support from independents than he does centrist democrats. He proved that the left is taking over the party, but we aren’t where we need to be yet.

He also proved that the party will fight tooth and nail against the left but then just expect to win without trying against the right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They don't care. They're all corporate removed anyway, they'll thrive under Republicans, except for the few of them who do actually care and would be too noisy.

Those who voted for them are the ones who should worry -- those whose existence and well being actually do depend on Republicans not being in power