this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1235 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1148 readers
596 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (44 children)

This is a strawman argument. AI is a tool. Like any tool, it's used for negative things and positive things. Focusing on just the negative is disingenuous at best. And focusing on AI's climate impact while completely ignoring the big picture is asinine (the oil industry knew they were the primary cause of climate change more than 60 years ago).

AI has many positive use-cases yet they are completely ignored by people who lack logic and rationality.

AI is helping physicists speed up experiments into supernovae to better understand the universe.

AI is helping doctors to expedite cancer screening rates.

AI is powering robots that can do the dishes.

AI is also helping to catch illegal fishing, tackle human trafficking, and track diseases.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I thought the statement was more about how much energy it costs to run AI while the planet burns.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But the reason the planet burns is because of how we generate the energy, not because of using energy. I'm not defending all these fucked up greedy corporations and their use of AI, machine learning, LLMs or whatever crap they are trying to get us to use want or not, but our real problem is based on energy generation, not consumption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah you're absolutely right but the fact is, we're burning through energy at a massive rate to power processing data for AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)