100
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Kamala Harris has the elect-ability and personality of a potato that you left on the counter for too long and it grows eyes.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I compare her more to broccoli or peas. Nobody's favorite food, but gives you the proper nutrients to fight fascism. Now shut up and eat your peas.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

If it’s Harris we’re toast. Plain and simple. If I’m proved wrong in that, no one would be happier than me.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Polls show her doing as well as Biden.

The thing that's going to win this election for the democrats is abortion. Harris might be good on that aspect of the race.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah she isn't inspiring, which is what we need. If she came out today, though, and said she will bring the law down on the GOP's corrupt elements... That might win enough hearts and minds to stir folks out to vote for her. And a good VP pick would inspire further confidence.

But she would really have to hit the ground running and improve her image.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The odds of that are abysmal.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
100 points (72.9% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS