SneerClub

989 readers

46 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

We regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshit (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

370 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Some 100 times+ compression, very fast and also at very low power (because it was inside the brain), and lossless.

And not stated but because it was inside the brain, I assume possible memory usage also wasn't that high etc. Sorry have no direct link to the specs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high

ye iirc we can remember like 7 things so that might be hard /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Soyweiser @V0ldek

The multi-electrode systems at the lab I worked in 2009 used a fiber connection to the host PC and generated terabytes of data, for just 128 or 92 electrodes (I forget) at not-all-that-many samples per second.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry what is the point here? Or do you just want to share a cool story about data transfer? (I'm not trying to be snarky, I feel like im missing something here).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Soyweiser

Just an example of the data involved in a brain-computer interface.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

look, with the 200x compression,