this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
175 points (95.3% liked)

Free Software

1057 readers
5 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I asked what the OP felt was better about GPLv3.

The person who responded made provably false statements. I know they are false, because I went to look it up; which is outlined in my “[whooped] out references”.

[–] Novi 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Enlighten me; what is it I’m missing?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

GPL is virally open source, because code using it needs to also be open source.

According to your comment, that doesn't apply to BSD, so BSD isn't virally open source, and the claim is true.

The reason some consider this better is because a company can't fork the code, keeping it private, improving their version with paid workforce while also merging in changes to the original project, thus ending up with a superior version that they can then sell for profit, to no benefit of the opensource version or the people contributing to it.

There's more reasons, and a whole ideological side, but I think that's the main practical reason for using copyleft licenses, and a big one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nothing I said is remotely untrue, for a start. Both licenses - and their pros and cons - are well documented, well-tread territory. It’s weird that you even had to ask.

And really weird how you seem to be taking my comment so personally while simultaneously spreading misinformation, literally admitting that you don’t know what you’re talking about (“not very well versed”) AND putting words in my mouth. 🤷🏽

Like, that’s a LOT. You doing alright, fam?