this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
23 points (76.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43978 readers
590 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be pedantic, child sexual abuse is the vicious crime. Pedophilia per se is, I would say, a part of a person with it. They can't help but get attracted to children. And under no circumstances that can be fulfilled legally, because to do so is committing statutory rape. Children can't consent. This distinction is very important because (a) not all pedophiles sexually assault children and not all child sexual assault perpetrators are pedophiles; and (b) pedophiles who know that acting on it is wrong get little outside help.
Aren't the vast majority of child sex abusers not pedophiles (or variant)? Isn't it more of a vulnerability thing?
Based on what I see on the news, yes. Access to children who implicitly trust them appears to be the commonality.
Yeah its a predator thing not a pedo/ebo/ebiphelia thing
Food for thought indeed, thanks.