54
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Thinking about this because of a greentext I saw earlier complaining about OF models.

It feels like a lot of the stigma surrounding sex work in the modern day (that doesn't just boil down to misogyny/gender norms/religion) is based on the fact that selling intimate aspects of one's self places a set value on something that many see as sacred; something that shouldn't have monetary value.

Not to say anything about the economic validity of a society without currency, but I think that, hypothetically, if that were to exist, sex work would be less stigmatized since this would no longer be a factor. Those engaged in sex work would be more likely to be seen as doing it because it's something they are good at/enjoy, and less because it's an "easy" way to make money, as some think. It would also eliminate the fear of placing set value on social, non sex-work related intimacy (not that those fears were well-founded to begin with).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

I don't think you'd have prostitution in a currencyless society. They wouldn't be prostitutes at that point.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

You don't need currency for it to be prostitution. Prostitution is exchanging sex for goods, services or currency.

[-] ryathal 3 points 6 days ago

So if I paid in chickens then it's not prostitution?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Chickens would be the currency in this scenario.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Some bang for your buck-awk, if you will.

[-] ryathal 2 points 6 days ago

Chickens aren't currency. Trade and currency are two different things.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

I’d counter that prostitution is sex work in exchange for something of value, and chickens still 100% qualify. I don’t think splitting hairs on currency vs. chickens changes anything here

[-] ryathal 1 points 6 days ago

Exchanging things is trade. Currency is a medium of exchange. Not having currency doesn't stop trade, it just makes it more difficult.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Chickens would be a medium of exchange in this scenario.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Yes, and that would not be currency. It might be useful to think of this as a tiered system.

'Trade' is a top-level idea, an exchange between entities. On a tier below that, i.e. a closer specification of 'trade', exists 'barter' (trading goods for other goods or services) and 'money' (trading some representational, notional item for goods/services). 'Chickens' as a payment is a further specification of bartering, while 'currency' is a further specification of 'money' (being 'money' defined/in use by a specific power/state).

[-] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago

There are more forms of sex work than just prostitution, though. Porn, sex surrogacy, etc. People can find those rewarding outside monetary incentive.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
54 points (69.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

28360 readers
511 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS