this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

Law

365 readers
3 users here now

Discussion about legal topics, centered around United States

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the ELI5.

Does me that if you can influence a judge for a favorable ruling (even if it's against the executive agency's), you're good?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yes, now if you have an interpretation and the agency has one the judge has to judge them both equally. If you can offer a more compelling understanding of the law the judge should favor your perspective. But if the agency has a better one they will win.