this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
682 points (97.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32464 readers
449 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
682
Basically the extent of my IPv6 knowledge (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Template source: https://web.archive.org/web/20210304000634/https://www.government.nl/topics/coronavirus-covid-19/visiting-the-netherlands-from-abroad/checklist

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no. If remote hosts could not send traffic to hosts behind NAT almost nothing would work.

The hacks employed to make NAT work make security worse, not better.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You're talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs