this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
115 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18828 readers
6332 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump's sentencing in his New York hush money case is scheduled for July 11.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There is no good outcome even in the cards. If he goes to jail it will feed into his base's persecution complex. If he gets off easy, nothing's more insufferable than an unpunished malignant narcissist. If he gets a huge fine, he will not pay.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

let them feed their persecution complex. we can lock them up, too if they get unruly.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If he goes to jail it will feed into his base’s persecution complex.

If he doesn't go to jail then they will probably say that he isn't really a convicted felon because he wasn't a convict at any point because it doesn't matter what happens, they will twist it into a persecution complex somehow.

I really wish people would stop worrying about actually holding shitheads accountable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I'm not "worried" so much as not excited about dealing with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

they will probably say that he isn't really a convicted felon because he wasn't a convict

That doesn't make sense. A convict is just that: someone convicted of a crime, it doesn't depend on jail-time served. Donald Trump is guilty of dozens of felonies for election finance violations related to illegal cover-up payments. So yeah, I totally expect them to say that...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is no good outcome even in the cards

Gotta think long term.

The "good outcome" is no jail sentence until after the election (or just probation). trump loses the election, and then is found guilty on any other case and then goes to jail for that because he's no longer a "first time offender".

The worst outcome is sentenced to prison before the election, but reporting is delayed till after the election and then Trump wins.

If that happens, he's never giving up power and he won't wait till the next election to pull some more stupid shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's hilarious that you guys think he's more likely to win if he's sentenced to jail.

This makes no sense at all.

You seem to think he'll gain votes from this guilty verdict when everything points to the opposite.

You guys give magats so much more credit than they deserve these people are cowards to their cores.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I think a bunch of ignorant folk view this conman as their hero and the prosecution of law he broke a political witch hunt by the left.

Which the right only says because they are itching to start their political hunt.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 0 points 3 months ago

I think there’s a sharply increased chance of political violence and domestic terrorism if he gets imprisoned before the election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotta think long term.

The problem with this approach is it literally is the weaponization of justice that the right loves to screech about. Timing Trump's trials or sentences to hurt him the most politically is twisting justice to our own ends, even if done in a theoretically altruistic manner. True it might lead to the best outcome for the country, but is that the risk we want to take- that if Trump does win, he won't see any punishment for his crimes at all?

On the other hand, I recognize this is the exact moral quandary that the right loves pushing non-conservatives into, and while we're arguing amongst ourselves about the best way to unfuck this pretzel they're busy burning it all to the ground. So I wouldn't say you're wrong necessarily, just that it's an uncomfortable path to tread.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Timing Trump’s trials or sentences to hurt him the most politically is twisting justice to our own ends, even if done in a theoretically altruistic manner

I was saying that's the most likely he lands in prison where he belongs....

Not that multiple states should collude to stall cases...

I mean, the states have been trying to get these moving for years. How would anyone rational accuse Dems of "timing" things?

If you're worrying about what republicans will say, don't. It doesn't matter what happens, republicans are going to say some stupid shit. Stop worrying about what they'll complain about, if they don't have anything to complain about, they'll invent something. And their voters can't tell the difference anyways.

I'm just tired of predicting what will happen long term, or the most likely path to a possible result, and having people act like I want that result or am trying to make it happen.

It's the same logic that got medicine women burnt as witches centuries ago. Move past it.

Whether the person making a prediction wants it to come true or not doesn't matter. What's important is how likely the prediction comes true

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If he gets a huge fine, he will not pay.

Correction, *his supporters will pay.