this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
429 points (79.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

672 readers
337 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is this fact/accurate??

Excluding top 1000 drops the average in half??

Definitely a reason to only ever use median instead.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Median is the middle point of the population and has its place when the range doesn't skew too much. I think a good representation of income is by percentages, as in "90% of people make $x,000 or below". This chart had dated (2010) data but its a better representation than I've found elsewhere1000002576

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Massive skews and tails are why you use median.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Its median is tool for understanding data but it doesn't paint a complete picture and can't be representative without other context. For example, if you have a bimodal distribution, the median doesn't tell you much just how like the average doesn't tell you much. There are other examples like this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Whole lot of wage theft going on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

15-19, yeah. I pegged it a little higher from what I was able to gather, around 23k. Some of that is just how the data is displayed though. Here at 5k it's entirely likely that you're seeing the federal minimum wage outweigh other factors, (7.25*2080=15,080). By fifths and quartiles it can come in a bit higher, but always below the median. And I don't think that gets nearly enough attention.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks. That graph shows the Mode, which skews even lower.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Nah there's no way this is accurate.

[–] Lucidlethargy -1 points 2 months ago

For what it's worth, AI models are saying just excluding the top 10 wealthiest Americans actually drops it from 68,700 to around 40,000 based on data from 2020.

Take this with a giant shovel of salt... But it does kind of corroborate the numbers presented.