Microblog Memes

5885 readers

3771 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

970

Yes, yes we do. (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

205 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago

How about you try reading what I wrote again. Apparently my simple analysis was too complex for you to understand.

A few basics for the logically and statistically impaired. This is a simple analysis of the probability of pairing up.

Having desirable traits for pairing up: I didn't mentioned what these were to for a very good reason. It doesn't matter to the analysis. What matters is the resulting rate of pairing up. Those that have traits desirable to pairing up are removed from the dating pool more quickly than those that don't.

This creates a constant strong selection pressure of removal on the pool.

I also used to terms to describe the potential relationship not the people. Because who or what these people are is immaterial.

Dud = no chance of pairing up.

Mediocre = moderate chance of paring up.

Winner = pairing up.

Seriously....