this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
169 points (99.4% liked)

BecomeMe

814 readers
1 users here now

Social Experiment. Become Me. What I see, you see.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

0.3% experienceing side effects is hardly "dangerous". That's an order of magnitude less frequent than peanut allergies.

This is not about looking after the best interest of anyone

[–] ArbitraryValue 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't disagree; I'm just talking about relative risk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

A thought experiment: do the legislators care as much about adequate food, shelter, medical care? Water and cooling breaks for laborers, including prisoners? If not, is protecting people an ostensible goal or actual goal?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Keep in mind, side effects can be literally anything reported - headaches, stomach cramps, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The quote says “major complications” and defines what that means. It’s not just side effects. It is definitely surprising that the rate of complications is so much higher for the pills. Still, I think that’s something a doctor should take into account when prescribing and not a valid reason to ban it.

[–] Zeppo 1 points 6 months ago

It says “major complication” that required hospitalization, not side effects.