this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
1236 points (95.8% liked)

Comic Strips

12679 readers
4191 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately for nature we're like cockroaches. You can kill the majority of humans with a big enough asteroid, but actually wiping us out while persevering vertebrate life is a tall order. Hell it was a tall order before we even got out of the neolithic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

"We're a virus with shoes." -- Bill Hicks

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Humanity survives adversity well" is not not something I would think of as "unfortunate."

[–] BigFatNips 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately for nature but depending on your perspective it's unfortunate for humans as well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I suppose from the perspective of misanthropes it's unfortunate, but I discount the opinions of misanthropes.

How is it unfortunate for nature? We're part of nature. In the long term humanity is nature's best mechanism for enduring long term, since eventually Earth is going to become uninhabitable due to the Sun's aging process.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We're part of nature.

This is the whole crux of the comic that I see so many people, even in this thread, misunderstanding. Nature isn't some "out there" thing, or even something we "emerged" from. There is no emerging! This is it. Me on my phone eating a second veggie dog while scrolling on my phone is part of nature. You reading it - also nature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, well that's tautological, isn't it? Nature is everything, so everything is nature. What's the point of having the word if it doesn't carry any meaning?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Got to call the world as we see it by some name

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We already have plenty. The universe. Reality. Existence. Creation. The world, as you said. What does the word nature bring to the table?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

One more word for the poets. Also, it can mean like just trees and green things, and shit, just like the universe can mean galaxies and black holes, and shit. But also mean everything everywhere including us.

[–] explodicle 3 points 5 months ago

Fun fact: the Oxygen Catastrophe wasn't a one-time event. It happened repeatedly in waves until life finally evolved a way to use the Oxygen.

When humans emerge from their bunkers, they'll quickly rediscover nuclear weapons and greenhouse pollution.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are we? We haven’t been around that long enough relative to the planet. We won’t be here in another billion years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nothing will be here in a billion years. Setting aside the fact that no species lasts that long anyway, Earth only has a few hundred million years of habitability left, if "nature" has its way. The sun's steadily brightening as it ages and tectonic processes are causing changes in Earth's atmosphere that will eventually prevent photosynthesis from operating, at which point Earth become the domain of a few hardy strains of bacteria again.

That is, unless humans (or our very distant descendants) decide to do some meddling to keep Earth alive. There's various ways to do that, from solar shields reducing the solar influx to moving Earth's orbit farther out to stripping material from the Sun itself to moderate its output.

"Gaia" has no foresight. She will sorely miss humanity's technological descendants once the planet gets in that situation, there's nothing she can do about it herself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There were things here a billion years ago. There will be things a billion years from now.

Humanity is a blip that will be forgotten.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There were things here a billion years ago. There will be things a billion years from now.

No, there really won't be. The Sun is getting brighter as it ages, in just a few hundred million years Earth will either cook to death or every single molecule of carbon dioxide will have to be taken out of the atmosphere to counteract the effect. Either way photosynthesis ends at that point.

Unless something technological intervenes.

Also, a billion years ago the only "things" that were around were bacteria. The Cambrian explosion didn't happen until 530 million years ago.

Humanity is a blip that will be forgotten.

Unless our descendants are still around, which they could easily be. Humanity doesn't need Earth to survive long-term. The reverse is not true.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the original idea I made the comment to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We won’t be here in another billion years.

I don't know about you, but I sure won't be

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Don’t wanna be around now, a billion years may as well be hell.