this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1179 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
2731 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1179
Every base is base 10 (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
194 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

we could just go with the hexidecimal way and go with A,B,C for 10,11 and 12

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No, 12 in base 12 is 10, not C. But yes, 10 can be A and 11 can be B

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dude's out here trying to get us to use base 13.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Why not?

Why not use a large prime as the base?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Honnest answer, 1/2 in DEC is 0.5 easy. 1/2 in base 13 is .6666666666.... Easy but ugly. You want a base that has comon fractions easily represented by decimals. People like dozenal since many fractions are easily represented. 1/2 = 0.6, 1/3 = 0.4, 1/4 = 0.3

I'm personally a fan of hexidecimal partly because I'm a programmer and partially because it can be halved several times

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is 1/2 in base 13 not 0.65?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, because the 5 in your answer is thinking in decimal. 0.05 is not the half of 0.1 in base 13.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

it's almost like you'd have to use a different notation system to express a different base...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Ahh yes, let’s introduce floating point rounding errors for one half. Sounds fun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Lets use base Pi and put an end to that infinite digit bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why use a fixed base? Or why not use an irrational number like e, the most efficient base

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I still think some largish prime, like 37 hits the perfect spot of being usable enough for people to use, but still useless enough to stop almost everybody from learning any advanced math.

But yeah, making integers non-representable is a serious trade-off that deserves consideration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

ah right, thanks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

That's pretty confusing in algebra, maybe normal sentences too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Over my dead body.