Technology

59622 readers

3263 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

502

We have to stop ignoring AI’s hallucination problem (www.theverge.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

208 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't need to verify reality, it needs to be internally consistent and it's not.

For example I was setting up logging pipeline and one of the filters didn't work. There was seemingly nothing wrong with configuration itself and after some more tests with dummy data I was able to get it working, but it still didn't work with the actual input data. So I have the working dummy example and the actual configuration to chatGPT and asked why the actual configuration doesn't work. After some prompts going over what I had already tried it ended up giving me the exact same configuration I had presented as the problem. Humans wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) make that error because it would be internally inconsistent, the problem statement can't be the solution.

But the AI doesn't have internal consistency because it doesn't really think. It's not making sure what it's saying is logical based on the information it knows, it's not trying to make assumptions to solve a problem, it can't even deduce that something true is actuality true. All it can do is predict what we would perceive as the answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Indeed. It doesn't even trend towards consistency.

It's much like the pattern-matching layer of human consciousness. Its function isn't to filter for truth, its function is to match knowns and potentials to patterns in its environment.

AI has no notion of critical thinking. It is purely positive "thinking", in a technical sense - it is positing based on what it "knows", but there is no genuine concept of self, nor even of critical thinking, nor even a non-conceptual logic or consistency filter.